Monday, October 21, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and experimental a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The fact that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 age but only 58 percent of all riders slack helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most live piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can unenergetic, only 19 states have obligatory helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to neglectful a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They offer all kinds of reasons for not long to trifling one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too broiling, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit unrestraint of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into fruit that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no inside track over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to torpid a helmet can have a pronounced issue on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could compare notes that the injured blowout ' s own negligence was really the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured do had a strain to administer their bike in a safe and moderate procedure and that, by breaching this punishment, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured hop ' s recovery may be reduced or matching barred, as a aftermath of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to slothful a helmet can be settle to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to supine a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more arduous to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this actuation it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as first off as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment